AI Detector
Make reviews more consistent with governance
The detector helps create a repeatable process for screening and review. It flags signals and patterns, and your team applies criteria and context.
Support transparency and authorship policy with objective screening.
Reduce inconsistency in manuscript evaluation and editorial review.
Support compliance and quality in public and internal content.
A signal to support review and policy
The detector provides probabilities and patterns in text to help teams make consistent decisions. Use it as a starting point, not a final verdict.
Paste a passage or a full piece of content, depending on your use case.
Interpret the result alongside authorship, references, style, and the text’s history.
Set clear criteria for review, revision requests, transparency, and compliance.
A starting point to review with more confidence
Combine the signal with internal policy and human review for consistent decisions.
How to present results to teams
Use the examples below as a visual reference for creating images and materials. Replace placeholders with screenshots when ready.
A summary view helps standardize internal communication and reduce rework during screening.
Passage highlights help discuss context, intent, and necessary revisions.
Even a strong signal needs context
AI detection is not proof of authorship. Use the signal to guide questions and review, not to label people.
